Casey v. Casey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging the speculative nature of goodwill being dependent upon future earnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Donahue v. Donahue
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 100×
• Hickum v. Hickum
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 29×
• Dickert v. Dickert
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-03-29· cited 22×
• Morris v. Morris
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-04-04· cited 20×
• Rgm v. Dem
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-28· cited 18×
• Moore v. Moore
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-10-07· cited 14×
• Keane v. Lowcountry Pediatrics, P.A.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-29· cited 10×
• Roberts v. Roberts
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-05· cited 9×
• Wood v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 7×
• McMillan v. McMillan
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-13· cited 7×
• Lemmon v. Lemmon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-04-04

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Holbrook v. Holbrook
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1981-06-04· cited 131×
• Nail v. Nail
  Texas Supreme Court· 1972-11-08· cited 101×
• Beasley v. Beasley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-20· cited 59×
• Casey v. Casey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-07-07· cited 7×