Tull v. Gundersons, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was entitled to compensation for efforts to mitigate damages by finding other work following breach of construction contract
• addressing an issue not considered on appeal because it was “bound to arise on remand” and “was fully briefed to the court of appeals”
• evidence of past performance will form the basis for a reasonable prediction of profits
• “[T]he plaintiff in a breach of 13 contract action bears the burden of proof with respect to damages . . . .”
• trial court improperly excluded evidence of plaintiffs “past profit experience on other projects”
• trial court improperly excluded evidence of plaintiffs “past profit experience on other projects”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).