Roberts v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing predecessor Rule 56(d), quoting City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum, 828 F.Supp. 851, 869 (D.Kan.1993) (citing 10A C. Wright, A. Miller & M. Kane, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 2737, at 458–59 (2d ed. 1983)
• “This rule [Rule 9 56(g)] does not authorize an independent motion to establish certain facts as true but merely 10 serves to salvage some constructive result from the judicial effort expended in denying a 11 proper summary judgment motion.”
• discussing Rule 56(g)’s predecessor, Rule 56(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).