Starr v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that lack of specificity in defining “loss, damage or injury” in indemnification agreement manifested intent not to include defense fees
• using expressio unius est exclusio alterius, the court construed a contract’s paragraph that did not include attorneys fees to be an intentional omission because the parties had included attorneys fees in another part of the contract
• expert affidavit creates material fact dispute as to causation.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).