Universal Motor Fuels, Inc. v. Johnston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the use of \successors or 13 assigns\ was sufficient to reflect the intent of the parties that an easement is appurtenant and passes to a landowners' successors
• noting where ambiguity or uncertainty of contract is involved, intent of the parties is not ascertained by resort to literal interpretation
• noting where ambiguity or uncertainty of contract is involved, intent of the parties is not ascertained by resort to literal interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).