Skip to main content

Roberts v. Brown

Citations

  • 43 So. 3d 673
  • 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 467
  • 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1452
  • 2010 WL 3398795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that prohibition prevents a lower court from acting in excess of its jurisdiction, but it is not appropriately used to reverse or correct prior acts
  • granting prohibition in a matter in which the Florida Supreme Court possessed exclusive jurisdiction
  • granting a writ of prohibition challenging the denial of a motion to dismiss a pre-election challenge to a proposed citizen-initiative amendment because the supreme court has exclusive jurisdiction over such matters
  • “Had we intended to overrule our prior declaration ..., we would have done so in a more definite and express manner.”
  • “Circuit courts are not authorized to issue advisory opinions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.