Skip to main content
· 2/8/1996

Wild v. Dozier

Citations

  • 672 So. 2d 16
  • 1996 WL 48419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the district court lacks the authority to review a motion for case reassignment
  • denying a petition for a writ of prohibition challenging the successive six-month assignments of a county court judge to hear half of the felony cases in a particular county in addition to his duties as a county court judge in that county
  • \[W]e conclude that this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to review judicial assignments.\
  • this Court has exclusive authority to review judicial assignments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.