STATE OF FLORIDA v. ANDREW SCOTT CROSE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \appellants' assertion of jurisdiction under the FTCA is correct - 8 - only if their claims do not fall within the coverage of the [SIAA]\
• using replacement cost, less depreciation, to calculate damages to pipeline beneath waterway
• recognizing its conflict with T.J. Falgout
• allision between vessel and piling in navigable waters came within admiralty jurisdiction
• action involving a pleasure boat's collision with a piling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).