Robert Davis v. Walter R. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an inmate “has no liberty interest in remaining at a particular correctional facility”
• holding premature a district court dismissal of §1983 claim for allegedly retaliatory transfer
• “[A] court need not act as an advocate for pro se litigants . . . .”
• “[A] court need not act as an advocate for pro se litigants . . . .”
• “[A] court need not act as an advocate for pro se litigants . . . .”
• “[A] court need not act as an advocate for pro se litigants . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).