Skip to main content
· 6/10/1983

Tyrone H. Maggette v. Stephen Dalsheim

Citations

  • 709 F.2d 800
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1170
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in Maclin, the Seventh Circuit expressed the “preferable view”
  • reversing grant of unopposed motion to dismiss because “under [the court’s] reading of the allegations . . . [the complaint was] sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss”
  • “Nothing in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Civil Rules of the Southern District requires a court to grant a motion by default simply because the nonmoving party fails to respond.”
  • “Nothing in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Civil Rules of the Southern District requires a court to grant a motion by default simply because the nonmoving party fails to respond.”
  • “Nothing in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Civil Rules of the Southern District requires a court to grant a motion by default simply because the nonmoving party fails to respond.”
  • “Nothing in either the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Civil Rules of the Southern District requires a court to grant a motion by default simply because the nonmoving party fails to respond.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Amone, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.