· 3/29/1985
Munz v. Parr
Citations
- 758 F.2d 1254
- 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30303
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[d]ismissal is proper only when it appears that the true identity of the defendant cannot be learned through discovery or the court’s intervention”
- discussing howa court should give a pro se plaintiff a statement of the complaint’s deficiencies and a chance to amend the complaint
- discussing how a court should give a pro se plaintiff a statement of the complaint’s deficiencies and a chance to amend the complaint
- discussing how a court should give a pro se Plaintiff a statement of the complaint’s deficiencies and a chance to amend the complaint
- discussing how a court should give a pro se plaintiff a statement of the complaint’s deficiencies and a chance to amend the complaint
- discussing how a court should give a pro se plaintiff a statement of the complaint’s deficiencies and a chance to amend the complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.