Robert C. McFarlane v. Esquire Magazine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• circulation in the District of a magazine containing an allegedly libelous article is not a sufficient “act” to support personal jurisdiction where the article was written outside of the District and delivered to a magazine outside of the District for publication
• “The standard of actual malice 3 is a daunting one.”
• sharing facts undermining the credibility of the article’s source

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).