Nebraska Court of Appeals· 8/22/1995

Robbins v. Robbins

Citations

536 N.W.2d 77
3 Neb. Ct. App. 953
1995 Neb. App. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

upholding district court’s refusal to make reduction in child support retroactive to date of filing for modification
value of food and drink provided by employer included in income
mere fact that before original decree parties do not require childcare but anticipate future changes of employment and potential for childcare expenses to arise is not sufficient for holding that such expenses are reasonably contemplated
mere fact that before original decree parties do not require childcare but anticipate future changes of employment and potential for childcare expenses to arise is not sufficient for holding that such expenses are reason- ably contemplated
generally courts are without authority to reduce amounts of accrued payments
value of food and drink provided by employer included in income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irwin, Mues, Sievers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.