Zerr v. Zerr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disregarding conclusory assertions that former colleagues were replaced by younger employees where no detail or evidence offered
• “[T]he 36 vast majority of plaintiff's purported evidence that he was .. . set up to fail amounts to nothing more than conclusions[.]”
• references to plaintiffs religion insufficient to support inference of discriminatory motive
• “Such remarks about a protected class do not themselves give rise to an inference of discrimination . . . unless they are accompanied by other evidence of discrimination or a plaintiff demonstrates a ‘nexus’ between the remark and the adverse employment action.”
• “Such remarks about a protected class do not themselves give rise to an inference of discrimination . . . unless they are accompanied by other evidence of discrimination or a plaintiff demonstrates a ‘nexus’ between the remark and the adverse employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).