Nebraska Supreme Court· 10/11/1991
Maddux v. Maddux
Citations
- 475 N.W.2d 524
- 239 Neb. 239
- 1991 Neb. LEXIS 334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that courts are generally without authority to reduce accrued payments
- child support payments become vested in payee as they accrue, and thus, courts are without authority to reduce amounts of such accrued payments
- cases over ruled by Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. Kreikemeier, supra note 2
- punitive contempt sanction conditioned upon future failure to pay child support is void
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-04-16· cited 342×
- Sickler v. SicklerNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-05-13· cited 180×
- Robbins v. RobbinsNebraska Court of Appeals· 1995-08-22· cited 48×
- State v. JacksonNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-07-17· cited 46×
- Dunning v. TallmanNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-08-13· cited 42×
- Hoover v. HooverNebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-11-16· cited 39×
- Wulff v. WulffNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-06-11· cited 37×
- State Ex Rel. Kayla T. v. RisingerNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-06-01· cited 32×
- Riggs v. RiggsNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-03-09· cited 31×
- Laschanzky v. LaschanzkyNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-10-21· cited 25×
- Henke v. GuerreroNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-02-15· cited 25×
- State on behalf of Kaaden S. v. Jeffery T.Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2018-10-16· cited 23×
- Jessen v. JessenNebraska Court of Appeals· 1997-07-29· cited 18×
- Griess v. GriessNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-04-04· cited 18×
- Schaad v. SimmsNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-05-29· cited 17×
- Willers Ex Rel. Powell v. WillersNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-12-18· cited 17×
- Sneckenberg v. SneckenbergNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-08-15· cited 17×
- State Ex Rel. Zirkle v. FoxWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 16×
- Truman v. TrumanNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-04-02· cited 12×
- Cooper v. CooperNebraska Court of Appeals· 1999-07-20· cited 12×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 1,344×
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 861×
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 677×
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear EnergySupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 204×
- State v. NowickiNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-09-20· cited 86×
- Ohler v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 75×
- Wassung v. WassungNebraska Supreme Court· 1939-06-09· cited 58×
- Ruehle v. RuehleNebraska Supreme Court· 1956-02-03· cited 50×
- Williams v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court· 1980-07-08· cited 38×
- Schrader v. SchraderNebraska Supreme Court· 1947-03-28· cited 36×
- McFarland v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1957-11-22· cited 33×
- Ferry v. FerryNebraska Supreme Court· 1978-11-01· cited 29×
- Eliker v. ElikerNebraska Supreme Court· 1980-07-22· cited 28×
- State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Faith Baptist ChurchNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-02-09· cited 25×
- Voichoskie v. VoichoskieNebraska Supreme Court· 1983-11-28· cited 22×
- Berg v. BergNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-07-05· cited 20×
- Harrison v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 1978-05-17· cited 18×
- State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Faith Baptist ChurchNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-01-04· cited 16×
- Romshek v. OsantowskiNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-08· cited 15×
- Lemburg Through Lemburg v. Adams CountyNebraska Supreme Court· 1987-04-24· cited 15×
Other cases named Maddux v. Maddux
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.