Skip to main content
· 5/9/2005

Roach v. Lee

Citations

  • 369 F. Supp. 2d 1194
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13294
  • 2005 WL 1119364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs common law fraudulent transfer claim was barred by section 3439.09(c)
  • holding that seven-year repose period in CAL. 24 CIV. CODE § 3439.09(c) trumps the statute of limitations period in 25 CAL. CODE CIV. PROC. § 338(d) and dismissing claims for transfers 26 outside seven years
  • holding that seven-year repose period in CAL. 24 CIV. CODE § 3439.09(c) trumps the statute of limitations period in 25 CAL. CODE CIV. PROC. § 338(d) and dismissing claims for transfers 26 outside seven years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.