· 1/10/2001

MacEdo v. Bosio

Citations

104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 1
86 Cal. App. 4th 1044
2001 Daily Journal DAR 1205
2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Our 9 Supreme Court denied review on April 12, 1994, and our remittitur issued on May 11, 10 1994. Hence, under section 1049 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the judgment became 11 final as of that date.”
UFTA is cumulative rather than exclusive remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haerle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.