Court of Appeals of Texas· 5/21/1998
Roa v. Roa
Citations
- 970 S.W.2d 163
- 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 3013
- 1998 WL 255044
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an appellate court’s review of any restricted appeal may include review of the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cayce, Dauphinot, Brigham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-04-30· cited 56×
- McAlister v. McAlisterTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-03-21· cited 28×
- In the Interest of J.E.P.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2000-10-12· cited 24×
- Tomsu v. TomsuCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2012-09-27· cited 15×
- Ratisseau v. RatisseauTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-04-19· cited 14×
- In Re JEPCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-10-12
- Donald Ray Watson v. Deborah R. WatsonTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-04-30
- Steven J. Steele v. Raquel J. SteeleTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-08-19
- in the Interest of L.T. and E.T., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-06-03
- Antun Domit v. Maria DomitTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2014-10-30
- in the Interest of E.M., Minor ChildTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2019-06-27
- Charlotte Skaggs Taylor v. William Clark TaylorTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2021-02-11
- Thomas George Craaybeek v. Marilyn Braune CraaybeekTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2021-05-06
- In the Interest of B.M., a Child v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2025-01-16
- Austin Paris v. Alexandra ParisTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2026-06-25
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 6,606×
- Carle v. CarleTexas Supreme Court· 1950-11-29· cited 337×
- McKnight v. McKnightTexas Supreme Court· 1976-11-24· cited 164×
- Smith v. LippmannTexas Supreme Court· 1992-04-22· cited 99×
- Considine v. ConsidineCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-04· cited 60×
- Texas Department of Health v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1997-08-14· cited 51×
- Schulz v. SchulzCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-03-04· cited 34×
- Lipshy v. LipshyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-12· cited 27×
- Schreiner v. SchreinerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-07· cited 21×
- Marr v. MarrTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1995-07-31· cited 20×
- Martinec v. ManeriCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-09· cited 16×
- Alcala v. WilliamsTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1995-10-04· cited 16×
- Swartz v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1934-11-17· cited 13×
- Faunce v. NCNB Texas National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-12-23· cited 10×
- Wheeler v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1986-06-03· cited 6×
- Mason v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1955-09-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.