McAlister v. McAlister

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that accepting payments under temporary support orders does not constitute acceptance of benefits
• “[F]rom the fact that there can be but one domicile and several residences, the supreme court has concluded that the element of ‘intent to make it a permanent home’ is not necessary to the establishment of a second residence away from the domicile.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).