Considine v. Considine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that change of residence is a contemplated change within meaning of family code, and parent’s move to Canada was not shown to be substantial and material as to be injurious to welfare of children
• explaining that requirement of modification hearing “implies the admission and consideration of proof—the opposite of taking allegations of the motion for modification ‘as confessed for want of an answer.’”
• remarriage by one party and relocation to Canada held insufficient
• re-marriage by one party and relocation to Canada held insufficient
• re-marriage by one party and relocation to Canada held insufficient
• a party inviting a final judgment waives right to appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).