Skip to main content

Rivera v. State

Citations

  • 123 S.W.3d 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that prejudice can only be shown where sufficient new evidence would have tipped the scales in defendant = s favor
  • noting that where the record does not make clear that defendant would not have pled guilty but for the error, no reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been different
  • noting that the result of the proceeding would have been different had information been available to counsel which would have led to mitigating evidence sufficient to reduce accused's sentence had counsel fulfilled duty to investigate
  • noting that the result of the proceeding would have been different had information been available to counsel which would have led to mitigating evidence sufficient to reduce accused’s sentence had counsel fulfilled duty to investigate
  • holding second Strickland prong 12 not satisfied where there was no indication that “information was available . . . which would have led to mitigating evidence sufficient to reduce [defendant’s] sentence had [counsel] fulfilled his duty”
  • counsel appointed for punishment phase failed to conduct adequate investigation of facts of defendant’s cases [particularly of the defendant’s role in the offenses] and of defendant’s criminal history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evelyn v. Keyes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.