District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/4/1997
Ritter v. Ritter
Citations
- 690 So. 2d 1372
- 1997 WL 154284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that evidence of an offer in a pending personal injury case was admissible in a dissolution of marriage case for the purpose of establishing the value of potential marital asset
- reversing the trial court's imputation of income because \[t]he evidence did not support the court's finding that [the husband] had the `present ability' to earn in excess of his salary\
- denying review of attorney’s fee and cost award because the judgment found an entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs but failed to specify an amount
- order which determines entitlement to fees and costs without setting the amount is a nonappealable, nonfinal order
- evidence of an offer in a pending personal injury case is admissible in a dissolution of marriage case for the purpose of establishing the value of a potential marital asset
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northcutt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roth v. RothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-09· cited 58×
- Hinton v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-13· cited 30×
- Freilich v. FreilichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-04· cited 24×
- Matajek v. SkowronskaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-31· cited 24×
- Wendel v. WendelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-27· cited 22×
- Alpert v. AlpertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-15· cited 21×
- Lidsky Vaccaro & Montes, PA v. MorejonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-13· cited 18×
- Leonard v. LeonardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-07· cited 18×
- Montanez v. MontanezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-18· cited 15×
- Ulrich v. EATON VANCE DISTRIBUTORS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-30· cited 14×
- Citizens Property Insurance Corp. v. AsheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17· cited 12×
- LaFlam v. LaFlamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-10· cited 10×
- Doig v. DoigDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-06· cited 9×
- Griffin v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 9×
- Gruber v. GruberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-15· cited 7×
- Griffin v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-16· cited 6×
- Argento v. ArgentoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 6×
- Castaldi v. CastaldiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-28· cited 6×
- Irwin v. IrwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-03· cited 6×
- Wolf v. WolfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-11· cited 5×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Weisfeld v. WeisfeldSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-15· cited 60×
- Harreld v. HarreldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-01· cited 36×
- McIlveen v. McIlveenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-09· cited 34×
- Gildea v. GildeaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-21· cited 14×
- Rease v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-17· cited 14×
- Schlesinger v. EmmonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-07· cited 7×
- Gomez v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.