Schlesinger v. Emmons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• increase in payor's ability to pay, standing alone, can justify upward modification of alimony where recipient's needs were not met by initial award due to payor's then-existing financial inability to meet those needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ritter v. Ritter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-04· cited 42×
• Bedell v. Bedell
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-30· cited 39×
• Eisemann v. Eisemann
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-06· cited 11×
• Boone v. Boone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-06· cited 7×
• McHugh v. Slomka
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-08-08· cited 3×
• Santiesteban v. Santiesteban
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-28· cited 2×
• Blackwell v. Blackwell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-08· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jaffee v. Jaffee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-03· cited 42×
• Powell v. Powell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-01· cited 18×
• Arce v. Arce
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-07-17· cited 12×
• Rogers v. Rogers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-12-19· cited 9×
• Bedell v. Bedell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-07· cited 8×
• Bedell v. Bedell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-23· cited 6×
• Lenton v. Lenton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-21· cited 6×
• Frantz v. Frantz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-26· cited 4×