Harreld v. Harreld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that two days' notice was not sufficient for a final hearing in a contested dissolution of marriage case
• remanding for the trial court to \make specific findings about the identity and value of all the significant marital assets and liabilities\
• two days' notice of hearing on motion to hold nonresident husband in contempt was not notice given a \reasonable time\ prior to hearing
• to justify departure from statutory instruction that distribution of marital assets be equal, court must analyze all relevant factors, including statutory factors, and must provide legally sufficient factual basis for distribution in final judgment
• parties served with notice must have actual notice and time to prepare
• two working days insufficient for reasonable notice for out-of-town defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).