Skip to main content

Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

Citations

  • 584 A.2d 1383
  • 526 Pa. 208
  • 1991 Pa. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the manufacturer has no duty to directly warn patients of the risks of drugs”
  • applying comment k to exclude strict liability for pharmacists who sell prescription drugs with inadequate warnings
  • applying comment k to exclude strict liability for pharmacists who sell prescription drugs with inadequate warnings
  • “[Requiring pharmacies to warn consumers] would have the effect of undermining the physician-patient relationship by engendering fear, doubt, and second-guessing.”
  • refusing to find pharmacists strictly liable for dispensing defective drugs because “it is not the pharmacist on whom the public ‘is forced to rely’ to obtain the products they need”
  • refusing to find pharmacists strictly liable for dispensing defective drugs because \it is not the pharmacist on whom the public `is forced to rely' to obtain the products they need\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Larsen, McDERMOTT, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.