Makripodis v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a trial court’s decision to dismiss the “portion of appellant's complaint which alleged a cause of action against [Defendant] for breach of a warranty of merchant[a]bility
• stating each individual for whom a prescription drug is prescribed is a unique organism who must be examined by a physician who is aware of the nature of the patient’s condition as well as his or her medical history
• druggist does not warrant that prescription drugs are fit for “ordinary uses,” as use of drug is a decision made by the physician
• druggist does not warrant that prescription drugs are fit for “ordinary uses,” as use of drug is a decision made by physician
• druggist does not warrant that prescription drugs are fit for “ordinary uses,” as use of drug is a decision made by the physician
• druggist does not warrant that prescription drugs are fit for “ordinary uses,” as use of drug is a decision made by the physician

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).