Skip to main content

Riley v. State

Citations

  • 585 A.2d 719
  • 1990 Del. LEXIS 406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a township was bound to the terms of a contract that was executed in accordance with its statutory authority
  • recognizing courts are not required to reconsider previously rejected claims that have been refined or restated
  • rejecting ineffective assistance claim because its “underlying” errors were rejected on direct appeal
  • fact that co-defendant, who was the actual killer, received lesser penalty as a result of a plea bargain considered in mitigation
  • \Justice does not require that an issue that has been previously considered and rejected be revisited simply because the claim is refined or restated.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christie, C.J., Horsey, Moore, Walsh and Holland, Jj., Constituting the Court en Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.