James William Riley v. Stanley W. Taylor M. Jane Brady , James W. Riley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding where district court denied leave to amend and two new claims “appear[ed] to be fully exhausted and not the subject of procedural default”
• permitting amendment of habeas application where the new claims had arguable merit and appeared to have been fully exhausted and not the subject of a procedural default
• \Permissible justifications [for denying leave to amend] include: (1) undue delay; (2) bad faith or dilatory motive; (3) undue prejudice to the opposition; (4) repeated failures to correct deficiencies with previous amendments; and (5) futility of the amendment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).