Skip to main content

Riley v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 464 S.E.2d 508
  • 21 Va. App. 330
  • 1995 Va. App. LEXIS 896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prosecution violated Batson when it struck jurors because they were older and female
  • finding that trial court “correctly concluded that age is a permissible basis upon which to exercise a peremptory strike”
  • addressing Equal Protection principles, not whether scope of voir dire was proper
  • “Here, however, the prosecutor’s explanation clearly references his intention to strike only women — albeit older women — from the jury panel. The fact that the Commonwealth used age to identify which women to strike does not overcome the constitutional infirmity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annunziata

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.