Roesch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that court will not defer to patently unreasonable decisions by defense counsel that are labeled as trial tactics
• \Tactical decisions generally are for counsel to make and will not be second-guessed unless shown to be patently unreasonable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-23· cited 19×
• Light v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-21· cited 9×
• Mathis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-25· cited 8×
• TAKENDRICK CAMPBELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-08· cited 6×
• Lamb v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-09· cited 5×
• Ridenour v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-09· cited 4×
• Bowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-09· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Sanborn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-07-16· cited 33×
• Majewski v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-22· cited 14×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-26· cited 4×
• Bailey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-17· cited 1×