Washington Supreme Court· 11/19/1918

Richmond v. Denny

Citations

104 Wash. 202
175 P. 957
1918 Wash. LEXIS 1152

Syllabus

<p>Appeal (272) — Record—-Statement of Facts — Incorporating Affidavits. Affidavits used upon a motion for a continuance not included in the statement of facts and made part of the record by the judge’s certificate cannot be considered on appeal.</p>

Judges: Fullerton, Holcomb, Main, Mount, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Fehler v. City of Montesano
Washington Supreme Court· 1920-03-04· cited 7×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Hayworth v. McDonald
Washington Supreme Court· 1912-03-18· cited 18×
F. Chevalier & Co. v. Wilson
Washington Supreme Court· 1902-10-18· cited 17×
Thurman v. Kildall
Washington Supreme Court· 1914-06-30· cited 14×
State v. Lee Wing Wah
Washington Supreme Court· 1909-05-26· cited 12×
Powers v. Washington Portland Cement Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1914-03-27· cited 12×
Dyke v. Johnson
Washington Supreme Court· 1914-12-01· cited 12×
Gray v. Granger
Washington Supreme Court· 1908-02-11· cited 8×
State v. Armstrong
Washington Supreme Court· 1915-09-17· cited 6×
Gazzam v. Zimmer
Washington Supreme Court· 1912-04-03· cited 5×
Lansdown v. Huff
Washington Supreme Court· 1918-07-31· cited 4×
Davidson v. King
Washington Supreme Court· 1918-08-14· cited 4×
Norris-Short Co. v. Everson Mercantile Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1918-08-19· cited 3×
Lebovitz v. Cogswell
Washington Supreme Court· 1915-01-05· cited 3×
Kuykendall v. Lambie
Washington Supreme Court· 1918-01-10· cited 3×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.