Washington Supreme Court· 8/14/1918

Davidson v. King

Citations

103 Wash. 379
174 P. 434

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Record—Affidavits. Affidavits on motion for a new trial cannot fie considered when not made a part of the statement of facts.</p> <p>Same — Record—Statement of Facts. • A statement of facts, certified to fie incomplete, and wfiicli is not indexed as required fiy Rule III, will fie struck out on motion.</p>

Judges: Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Northern Life Insurance v. Walker
Washington Supreme Court· 1923-01-19· cited 17×
Fehler v. City of Montesano
Washington Supreme Court· 1920-03-04· cited 7×
Richmond v. Denny
Washington Supreme Court· 1918-11-19· cited 3×
Larson v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court· 1922-07-21· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Stern v. City of Spokane
Washington Supreme Court· 1913-04-18· cited 11×
State v. Moran
Washington Supreme Court· 1912-01-15· cited 6×
Norton v. Pacific Power & Light Co.
Washington Supreme Court· 1914-05-16· cited 6×
Gazzam v. Zimmer
Washington Supreme Court· 1912-04-03· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.