Skip to main content

State v. Armstrong

Citations

  • 87 Wash. 275
  • 151 P. 775
  • 1915 Wash. LEXIS 900

Syllabus

<p>Rape—Carnal Knowledge of Child—Pregnancy—Materiality. Upon the trial of a charge of carnal knowledge of a child under the age of fifteen years, it is not error to refuse to appoint physicians to make a physical examination to determine whether the prosecutrix was pregnant, and, if so, whether conception took place after the time of the alleged offense; since it could not disprove the charge.</p> <p>Appeal—Record—Statement op Pacts—Affidavits. Affidavits in support of a motion for a new trial cannot be considered on appeal unless made a part of the record by bill of exceptions or statement of facts.</p>

Judges: Main

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.