Ninth Circuit· 3/30/1992
Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants
Citations
- 959 F.2d 1468
- 1992 WL 58817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 25 the failure to timely serve responses to discovery constitutes a waiver of any objections
- stating that the contem-nor must establish “that it is ‘factually impossible ’ to comply with the ... order” (emphasis in original)
- noting that Societe Nationale 's \list of factors is not exhaustive\
- rejecting a 22 foreign corporation’s argument that state secrecy laws prohibited it from disclosing the information 23 ordered by the district court
- finding district court properly awarded fees 14 and costs incurred in obtaining court order compelling discovery and in litigating issues 15 pertaining to sanctions motions under Rule 37(b)(2)
- stating civil contempt sanctions are used 3 to coerce the contemnor to comply with the court’s orders in the future, and the sanction is 4 conditioned upon continued noncompliance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Browning, Nelson, Skopil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of ArgentinaSecond Circuit· 2012-08-20· cited 232×
- Ama Multimedia, LLC v. Marcin WanatNinth Circuit· 2020-08-17· cited 144×
- Shell Offshore Inc. v. Greenpeace, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2016-03-04· cited 99×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. StephensWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1992-12-16· cited 89×
- Campuzano v. Alavi FoundationSecond Circuit· 2016-07-20· cited 86×
- Brady v. BrownNinth Circuit· 1995-03-21· cited 76×
- John Frederick DORMAN, Appellant, v. EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1994-06-07· cited 65×
- Autotech Technologies LP v. Integral Research & Development Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2007-08-29· cited 64×
- United States v. BrightNinth Circuit· 2010-02-26· cited 58×
- United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc., Hca, Inc. And West Paces Medical CenterSixth Circuit· 2006-04-11· cited 48×
- Jenny Rubin v. Islamic Republic ofSeventh Circuit· 2011-03-29· cited 37×
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerS.D. New York· 2013-10-10· cited 36×
- WeRide Corp. v. Kun HuangN.D. California· 2019-03-22· cited 35×
- Ramirez v. County of Los AngelesC.D. California· 2005-08-15· cited 35×
- Vincent De Frontbrune v. Alan WofsyNinth Circuit· 2016-09-26· cited 33×
- Strauss v. Credit Lyonnais, S.A.E.D. New York· 2008-03-10· cited 33×
- Cargill, Inc. v. Ron Burge Trucking, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2012-06-01· cited 33×
- General Insurance Company Of America v. Eastern Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Third Circuit· 1997-09-22· cited 31×
- Strauss v. Credit Lyonnais, S.A.E.D. New York· 2007-05-25· cited 29×
- Blumenthal v. DrudgeDistrict of Columbia· 1999-04-22· cited 28×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court· 1958-06-16· cited 1,195×
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 861×
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court· 1975-01-15· cited 849×
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 677×
- Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerNinth Circuit· 1981-07-17· cited 331×
- W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., InternationalSupreme Court· 1990-01-22· cited 278×
- Whittaker Corporation Whittaker Controls, Inc. v. Execuair Corporation Execuair Sales Corporation David ManhanNinth Circuit· 1992-01-03· cited 230×
- Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 221×
- Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of Corrections, Walter D. Balla v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 1989-03-03· cited 204×
- Falstaff Brewing Corporation, General Brewing Company S & P Company v. Miller Brewing Company, and Philip Morris, IncorporatedNinth Circuit· 1983-03-28· cited 194×
- Lois Frolova v. Union of Soviet Socialist RepublicsSeventh Circuit· 1985-05-01· cited 167×
- Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of AmericaNinth Circuit· 1976-12-27· cited 165×
- General Signal Corporation v. Donallco, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1986-04-24· cited 150×
- Rex L. Shuffler and Betty L. Shuffler v. Heritage Bank, a California CorporationNinth Circuit· 1983-11-25· cited 140×
- Banerjee v. Board of Trustees of Smith CollegeSupreme Court· 1981-12-07· cited 133×
- DiCarlo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 131×
- Duran v. City Of DouglasNinth Circuit· 1990-06-04· cited 110×
- United States v. AsayNinth Circuit· 1980-02-21· cited 102×
- State of Ohio v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Honorable Sherman G. FinesilverTenth Circuit· 1978-03-22· cited 95×
- Self Directed Placement Corp., and Charles D. Hoffman v. Control Data Corporation, and Control Data InstituteNinth Circuit· 1990-07-10· cited 81×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.