John Frederick DORMAN, Appellant, v. EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court’s choice-of-law determination is a legal issue subject to de novo review
• holding that district court’s choice-of-law determination is a legal issue subject to de novo review
• noting that “[t]he Canadian courts have held unequivocally that Canadian law does not make available to plaintiffs a theory of strict products liability”
• applying Canadian law where negligent saw design in Missouri caused injury in Canada
• applying Canadian law where negligent saw design in Missouri caused injury in Canada
• identifying (b), (c), and (e) as the most relevant factors in personal injury claims caused by accidents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).