N.D. Illinois· 2/23/2006
Richman v. Sheahan
Citations
- 415 F. Supp. 2d 929
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6667
- 2006 WL 408657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that certain issues regarding expert testimony can only be addressed as testimony unfolds at trial
- noting that “a number of courts have been unwilling to allow” testimony on whether a defendant acted “reasonably” or “appropriately” “‘on the theory that the opinion constitutes an impermissible legal conclusion”
- claim of prejudice as result of belated disclosure of expert report belied by party’s decision to proceed with expert’s deposition instead of filing a motion to bar
- detailed pretrial consideration on scope of such opinions from defense expert
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sommerfield v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2008-11-03· cited 29×
- Halcomb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2007-12-07· cited 26×
- CLC Creditors' Grantor Trust v. Howard Savings Bank (In Re Commercial Loan Corp.)N.D. Illinois· 2008-11-19· cited 24×
- Abdulla v. KlosinskiS.D. Georgia· 2012-09-25· cited 22×
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationN.D. Illinois· 2006-05-24· cited 16×
- United States v. Marjory DingwallSeventh Circuit· 2021-07-30· cited 14×
- CDX Liquidating Trust Ex Rel. CDX Liquidating Trustee v. Venrock AssociatesN.D. Illinois· 2009-07-23· cited 13×
- Thomas v. BarzeD. Minnesota· 2014-09-30· cited 10×
- Scottsdale Insurance v. City of WaukeganN.D. Illinois· 2010-02-09· cited 9×
- Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Commc'ns Corp.E.D. Illinois· 2018-05-17· cited 7×
- In Re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationN.D. Illinois· 2006-08-29· cited 5×
- Mci Commc'ns, Inc. v. Maverick Cutting & Breaking LLCD. Maine· 2019-03-12· cited 4×
- Scott v. City of ChicagoN.D. Illinois· 2010-07-20· cited 2×
- United States v. ZabavskyDistrict of Columbia· 2022-11-16
- B.D., by their next friend, Christine Wellington, et al. v. Kelly Ayotte, in her official capacity as the Governor of New Hampshire1, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2023-05-12
Cites
91 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 16,485×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 10,043×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 4,617×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 2,352×
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 1,617×
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,044×
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-27· cited 931×
- Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 795×
- Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2002-04-18· cited 685×
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-12-11· cited 406×
- Clyde Ammons v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2004-05-21· cited 406×
- Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1989-06-19· cited 393×
- Mark A. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanySeventh Circuit· 2000-06-02· cited 386×
- Hygh v. JacobsSecond Circuit· 1992-04-09· cited 324×
- David Sherrod v. Darlene Lingle, R.N. Mary Geiger, R.N. Betty Lorance, R.N. C.P. Ramaswamy, M.D. Rajendra Shroff, M.D. Franklin Hospital DistrictSeventh Circuit· 2000-07-27· cited 301×
- Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc. And Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2003-01-24· cited 268×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.