Clyde Ammons v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by striking facts included in non-movant’s responsive memorandum
• holding that a nonmoving party’s response that factual allegations in the moving party’s statement of material facts were irrelevant did not excuse the nonmoving party from (continued...
• holding that “where a non-moving party denies a factual allegation by the party moving for summary judgment, that denial must include a specific reference to the affidavit or other part of the record that supports such a denial”
• stating that the court has “repeatedly held that a district court is entitled to expect strict compliance with Rule 56.1”
• holding a function to be essential where the plaintiff spent “half of the day” performing it
• noting that Local Rule 56.1 “envisions a separate statement of additional facts” and holding that non-responsive facts in a Local Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B) response “should have been included in a separate statement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).