· 8/14/1991
Richins v. Delbert Chipman & Sons Co.
Citations
- 817 P.2d 382
- 167 Utah Adv. Rep. 12
- 1991 Utah App. LEXIS 124
- 1991 WL 155863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating when the reason for motion comes within subparagraphs (1) through (6), movant cannot rely upon subparagraph (7)
- reviewing district court's conclusions of law in context of a 60(b) motion for correctness
- ―Relief under [paragraph (b)(6)] embodies three requirements: ‗First[,] that the reason be one other than those listed in subdivisions (1) through [(5)] . . . .‘‖(citation omitted)
- “Relief under [paragraph (b)(6)] embodies three requirements: ‘First[,] that the reason be one other than those listed in subdivisions (1) through [(5)] . . . .’”(citation omitted)
- “Relief under [paragraph (b)(6)] embodies three requirements: ‘First[,] that the reason be one other than those listed in subdivisions (1) through [ (5) ] ....’ ’’(citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garff, Jackson, Orme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.