Court of Appeals of Utah· 11/10/1994

Trembly v. Mrs. Fields Cookies

Citations

884 P.2d 1306
252 Utah Adv. Rep. 23
1994 Utah App. LEXIS 158
1994 WL 638012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

identifying factors that may weigh in favor of reconsidering a prior ruling under rule 54(b)
permitting reconsideration of summary judgment under Rule 54(b) and holding summary judgment did not fully dispose of case when part of counterclaim remained in trial court, and was thus subject to revision
permitting reconsideration of summary judgment under Rule 54(b) and holding summary judgment did not fully dispose of case when part of counterclaim remained in trial court, and was thus subject to revision
denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final order or judgment, thus it is not an order from which Rule 60(b) affords relief
“[T]he substance, not caption, of a motion is dispositive in determining the character of the motion.”
“ ‘A motion or action to modify a final judgment is addressed to the discretion of the trial court....’ ” (quoting Laub v. South Central Utah Tel. Ass’n, 657 P.2d 1304, 1306 (Utah 1982))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bench, Davis and Orme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.