Trembly v. Mrs. Fields Cookies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying factors that may weigh in favor of reconsidering a prior ruling under rule 54(b)
• permitting reconsideration of summary judgment under Rule 54(b) and holding summary judgment did not fully dispose of case when part of counterclaim remained in trial court, and was thus subject to revision
• permitting reconsideration of summary judgment under Rule 54(b) and holding summary judgment did not fully dispose of case when part of counterclaim remained in trial court, and was thus subject to revision
• denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final order or judgment, thus it is not an order from which Rule 60(b) affords relief
• “[T]he substance, not caption, of a motion is dispositive in determining the character of the motion.”
• “ ‘A motion or action to modify a final judgment is addressed to the discretion of the trial court....’ ” (quoting Laub v. South Central Utah Tel. Ass’n, 657 P.2d 1304, 1306 (Utah 1982))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).