Skip to main content

Richardson v. State

Citations

  • 875 So. 2d 673
  • 2004 WL 1091140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hearsay objection was sufficient to preserve the issue of whether the business records exception applied
  • holding that trial court erred in allowing witness with no personal knowledge to testify about the amount of money taken from a cash register based on the contents of a record that was never introduced into evidence
  • confining convenience store clerk in back freezer room after tak- ing money from cash register ‘‘facilitated the robbers’ flight from the crime scene . . . and substantially les- sened the risk of quick detection’’
  • general hearsay objection is sufficient to preserve for appellate review the failure of the proponent to lay a proper predicate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.