Neeley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that hearsay objection was sufficient to preserve the issue of whether the business record exception or medical treatment exception applied
• finding it unnecessary to address the second issue on appeal, where the first was dispositive
• finding it unnecessary to address the second issue on appeal, where the first was dispositive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-07· cited 12×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-21· cited 6×
• Mitchell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-14· cited 5×
• Sprouse v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-16· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Torres-Arboledo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-24· cited 137×
• Keen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-28· cited 74×
• Conley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-20· cited 60×
• Van Zant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-15· cited 27×
• Richardson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-18· cited 9×