Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eleventh Circuit· 3/2/2010

Richardson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 598 F.3d 734
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4269
  • 2010 WL 693629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for reconsideration where plaintiff simply attempted to relitigate old matters
  • holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for reconsideration where plaintiff simply attempted to relitigate old matters
  • holding that plaintiff’s identification of defendant as “John Doe (Unknown Legal Name), Guard, Charlotte Correctional Institute” was insufficient in identifying defendant “among the many guards employed [there]”
  • holding that plaintiff’s identification of the defendant as “John Doe (Unknown Legal Name), Guard, Charlotte Correctional Institute” was insufficient in identifying the defendant “among the many guards employed [there]”
  • concluding that identification of a defendant as “John Doe (Unknown Legal Name), Guard, Charlotte Correctional Institute” was insufficient to identify the defendant among the many guards employed at that facility
  • holding that the pro se prisoner plaintiff’s description of a defendant “as ‘John Doe (Unknown Legal Name), Guard, Charlotte Correctional Institute’…was insufficient to identify the defendant among the many guards employed” at the correctional institute where the underlying incident occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Wilson, Kravitch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Richardson v. Johnson

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.