New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a remand order based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction is unreviewable even when “clearly errone- ous”
• concluding that a remand order based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction is un- reviewable even when “clearly erroneous”
• explaining that “a district court does not have to expressly state its reliance on section 1447(c) to preclude appellate review”
• explaining that a remand order for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is unreviewable even if it is clearly erroneous
• explaining that a remand order for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is unreviewable even if it is clearly erroneous
• stating that “a district court does not have to expressly state its reliance on section 1447(c) to preclude appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).