Jim E. Chandler v. James Crosby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs must still be certified under the federal equivalent of Rule 1-023 when applying vicarious exhaustion for the PLRA
• holding that the severity and duration inform whether the claims of inadequate cooling and ventilation are 21 unconstitutional
• concluding that the named class member satisfied the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement “as to the entire plaintiff class”
• holding that plaintiffs must still be 16 certified under the federal equivalent of Rule 1-023 when applying vicarious 17 exhaustion for the PLRA
• holding that “a prisoner’s mere discomfort, without more, does not offend the Eighth Amendment”
• highlighting that “extreme deprivations” are required to make out an Eighth Amendment conditions-of-eonfinement claim (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).