Richard Mark Watts v. Ruth Oliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that offer of proof was insufficient to preserve issue for appeal because it was not specific enough
• finding no harm where appellant failed to identify any issue that he was unable to brief as a result of the trial court’s failure to make findings and conclusions
• construing challenge to party’s entitlement to statutory attorney’s fees as legal sufficiency challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).