Pirtle v. Gregory

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, having failed to except to the lack of pleadings at any point during trial, the defendant waived any error in the plaintiff’s pleadings
• holding that it “was not fundamental error for the trial court to proceed to judgment as the absence of any party did not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction”
• holding that, having failed to except to the lack of pleadings at any point during trial, the defendant waived any error in the plaintiff = s pleadings
• holding that it “was not fundamental error for the trial court to proceed to judgment as the absence of any party did not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction”
• holding that defendants could not complain on appeal about nonjoinder of indispensable party because they did not complain of error at trial level by exception, plea in abatement, or motion to join other parties
• stating that a party “should not be permitted to waive, consent to, or neglect to complain about an error at trial and then surprise his opponent on appeal by stating his complaint for the first time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).