Supreme Court of Arkansas· 10/25/1948
Rice v. Rice
Citations
- 214 S.W.2d 235
- 213 Ark. 981
- 1948 Ark. LEXIS 569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no additional service of process is necessary to collect alimony arrearage under a separate maintenance decree
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-06· cited 37×
- Altman v. AltmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-05· cited 28×
- Snider v. SniderWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-07-09· cited 21×
- Rumpf v. RumpfTexas Supreme Court· 1951-10-03· cited 21×
- Office of Child Support Enforcement v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-10-16· cited 11×
- Woods v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-03-11· cited 9×
- Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1953-11-16· cited 5×
- Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-12-14· cited 2×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court· 1940-11-12· cited 1,544×
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1945-05-21· cited 1,048×
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 608×
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court· 1946-04-29· cited 294×
- Durlacher v. DurlacherNew York Supreme Court· 1940-02-19· cited 22×
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1942-07-06· cited 14×
- Dadmun v. DadmunMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1932-05-19· cited 12×
- Gulley v. BacheSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1911-04-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.