Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/5/1978
Altman v. Altman
Citations
- 386 A.2d 766
- 282 Md. 483
- 1978 Md. LEXIS 382
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The alimony awarded by the Ecclesiastical Courts in such cases constituted a recognition and enforcement of the husband’s duty to support a wife which continued after the judicial separation.”
- “[T]he Legislature had intended to provide for alimony of the same character and limitations as the alimony the courts had for so long dealt with in the context of the divorce a mensa et thoro.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth, Cole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Alston v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-23· cited 74×
- Turrisi v. SanzaroCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-02-04· cited 42×
- Dobbyn v. DobbynCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-02· cited 32×
- Bender v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-10· cited 28×
- Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-11-05· cited 27×
- Lohman v. LohmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-25· cited 26×
- Wallace v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-05· cited 23×
- Mahoney v. Smith (In Re Smith)E.D. Virginia· 1980-03-14· cited 22×
- Snider v. SniderWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2001-07-09· cited 21×
- Wolff v. WolffCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-07-17· cited 19×
- Chapman v. KamaraCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-25· cited 19×
- Ledvinka v. LedvinkaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-29· cited 17×
- Kortobi v. KassCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-06· cited 12×
- Scott v. ScottCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-14· cited 12×
- Komorous v. KomorousCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-11-09· cited 11×
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-08· cited 11×
- Cottone v. CottoneDelaware Family Court· 1988-05-02· cited 10×
- Speropulos v. SperopulosCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-10-05· cited 8×
- Miles v. StovallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-05-01· cited 7×
- Kingsley v. KingsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-04-09· cited 7×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court· 1977-06-24· cited 2,976×
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 1,003×
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court· 1948-06-07· cited 608×
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 348×
- Mitchim v. MitchimTexas Supreme Court· 1975-01-08· cited 108×
- Stambaugh v. StambaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 74×
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1956-05-21· cited 71×
- Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-10-05· cited 64×
- Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Iowa· 1916-06-29· cited 50×
- Stucky v. StuckyNebraska Supreme Court· 1971-04-09· cited 48×
- U. S. Industries, Inc., a Corporation, and Diversacon Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. F. Browne GreggThird Circuit· 1976-07-19· cited 43×
- Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Vermont· 1955-05-03· cited 43×
- Mizner v. MiznerNevada Supreme Court· 1968-04-15· cited 42×
- Dackman v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-02-07· cited 42×
- Cole v. Randall Park Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-01· cited 41×
- Crane v. MeginnisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1829-06-15· cited 40×
- Tasanilla Hopson v. Delores Palmer HopsonD.C. Circuit· 1955-01-20· cited 36×
- Glading v. FurmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-03-27· cited 36×
- Miles v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-10-05· cited 25×
- Little v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-06-26· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.