Skip to main content
· 10/3/1951

Rumpf v. Rumpf

Citations

  • 242 S.W.2d 416
  • 150 Tex. 475
  • 1951 Tex. LEXIS 415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reaching same conclusion as that expressed by dissent
  • similar accrual rule for alimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smedley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.