Ricci v. Ricci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a seven-and-one-half-month delay in service was sufficient for the trial justice to dismiss a complaint under Rule 41(b)(2), where plaintiff failed to proffer a good cause for the delay
• finding no good cause where plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to serve the defendant at her home for several months without attempting alternative means of service
• finding no good cause where plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to serve the defendant at her home for several months without attempting alternative means of service
• declining to find good cause for a seven and one-half month delay where the plaintiff did not seek alternative service and the constable \did not provide enough details and particulars concerning each occasion when service was unsuccessfully attempted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).